🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy offers a misguided assessment of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and so-called "woke" policies represent an grave threat to the continent's identity. However, this perspective is based on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The true danger facing Europe is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Economic Divide Separating the US and Europe

Statistics paint a stark picture. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by 87%, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent growth for the EU. During this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from 76.5% to just 50% of the US level. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than major EU nations like France and Italy.

Today, roughly 50% of the global top fifty technology firms are US-based, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Question

This widening economic gap is driven by stronger productivity growth in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last five decades, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at over ten billion dollars, versus only fourteen in the European continent.

This gap raises a pressing issue: In the race for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, what is Europe positioned? Experts widely concede it is essentially a two-horse race involving the United States and China, with Europe entering at a clear handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several key reasons account for this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. The EU still lacks a genuine capital markets union, which caps the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented rules hamper Europe. A US startup can introduce a product under a single regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 separate regimes, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on risk-taking differ sharply. In some EU nations, business failure was once met with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has eroded its ability in breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Hopefulness

In spite of these hurdles, one can find reasons for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have begun to propose serious reform. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of major changes.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, Europe's strengths might enable much higher levels of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe retains considerable advantages: high-quality human capital, top-tier schools and universities, and world-class labs. Coupled with a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to unleash a surge of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly increase economic output by implementing and tailoring advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a critical crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's technological decline has been steady. But, if it fails to take bold steps to address its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in world influence.